Commission v. Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
European Court of Justice
E.C.J. Case C-473/93, E.C.R. 1996 I-3207 (1996)
- Written by Victoria Sarant , JD
Facts
In 1988, the Commission of the European Communities (the commission) (plaintiff) published Communication 88/C 72/02, a reminder to member states to allow other member states’ workers free movement and access to employment. Employment in various state-run sectors in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (defendant) was restricted to Luxembourg nationals by statute. The commission asserted that this restriction violated European Union treaty provisions on the free movement of workers. In January 1988, the commission sent Luxembourg a letter indicating that Luxembourg needed to eliminate its statutory nationality provisions. Luxembourg responded in October 1990 that it would not take the measures requested by the commission. In March 1991, the commission sent six formal letters to Luxembourg regarding the alleged violation and asked Luxembourg to respond within six months. Luxembourg responded in May 1992 and indicated its intent to keep its previous position. In July 1992, the commission issued six reasoned opinions regarding the areas of violation and gave Luxembourg four months to comply. This four-month period was longer than the one to two months typically allowed by the commission for compliance with reasoned opinions, and Luxembourg never sought an extension of the period. Luxembourg ultimately failed to comply, and the commission brought enforcement proceedings against Luxembourg in the European Court of Justice. Luxembourg challenged the commission’s actions because the commission had only given Luxembourg four months to comply with the commission before bringing suit, which Luxembourg argued was not realistically enough time to overhaul its entire administrative system. The commission responded that four months was far longer than the usual notice it provided and further contended that Luxembourg had constructive notice of the commission’s position in 1988 when the commission published Communication 88/C 72/02.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.