Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate Bureau

Court of Appeals of North Carolina
124 N.C. App. 674 (N.C. Ct. App. 1996)


Facts

On February 1, 1994, the North Carolina Rate Bureau (Bureau) (plaintiff) filed a request to increase the rates of return for private passenger automobiles by 10.8 percent and for motorcycles by 22.4 percent. The commissioner of insurance of North Carolina (commissioner) (defendant) held a hearing. At the hearing, the commissioner calculated the rates of return using statutory accounting provisions (SAP) instead of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The commissioner supported his use of SAP with expert testimony and by citing to the appropriate statute. When determining the current cost and expense provisions, the Commissioner used an expert witness’s findings instead of the Bureau’s findings. Although there were inconsistencies between these findings, the commissioner relied only on the expert witness. Based on the commissioner’s SAP calculations, the rates of return would be reduced for automobiles by 13.8 percent and for motorcycles by 10.2 percent. The commissioner disapproved the Bureau’s request and reduced the rates of return based on the SAP calculations. The Bureau appealed, arguing that the commissioner should not have used SAP and that the commissioner’s calculations were not supported by material and substantial evidence.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (McGee, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.