Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sunnen
United States Supreme Court
333 U.S. 591 (1948)
Between 1937 and 1941, Sunnen (defendant) gave his wife several patent license contracts as gifts, in order to avoid having the resultant royalties be attributed to him as taxable income. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (plaintiff) challenged this gift, arguing that the royalties were taxable income. The Tax Court agreed, except for royalties paid in 1937 on a 1928 contract. The court came to this conclusion based on a previous holding by the Board of Tax Appeals, which stated that the royalties received between 1929 and 1931 on the 1928 contract were not taxable. Applying res judicata, the Tax Court found that Sunnen could not be taxed in 1937 on the 1928 contract. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)
Dissent (Frankfurter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.