Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sunnen

333 U.S. 591 (1948)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sunnen

United States Supreme Court
333 U.S. 591 (1948)

Play video

Facts

Between 1937 and 1941, Sunnen (defendant) gave his wife several patent-license contracts as gifts, in order to avoid having the resultant royalties be attributed to him as taxable income. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (plaintiff) challenged this gift, arguing that the royalties were taxable income. The Tax Court agreed, except for royalties paid in 1937 on a 1928 contract. The court came to this conclusion based on a previous holding by the Board of Tax Appeals, which stated that the royalties received between 1929 and 1931 on the 1928 contract were not taxable. Applying res judicata, the Tax Court found that Sunnen could not be taxed in 1937 on the 1928 contract. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)

Dissent (Frankfurter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership