Commissioner v. British Motor Car Distributors

278 F.2d 392 (1960)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Commissioner v. British Motor Car Distributors

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
278 F.2d 392 (1960)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

British Motor Car Company (the partnership) was a partnership that imported and sold foreign automobiles owned by Kjell H. Qvale and his wife. In 1951 the partnership purchased Empire Home Equipment Company (Empire), a failing appliance company, for $21,250. After the acquisition, Empire changed its name to British Motor Car Distributors (Distributors) (plaintiff). The partnership then acquired all outstanding stock from Distributors and transferred its assets to Distributors. In 1952 and 1953, Distributors was a successful company. Despite this, Distributors carried forward the operating losses it had sustained as Empire during the years 1949, 1950, and 1951 and deducted those losses from its income. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the Commissioner) (defendant) disallowed the deductions, arguing that § 269(a) of the Internal Revenue Code prevented Distributors from carrying forward Empire’s losses because Empire acquired the partnership and became Distributors principally for tax purposes. The United States Tax Court disagreed. The tax court held that § 269(a) applied only to a profitable company that acquired a failing company. In this case, the tax court reasoned, the failing company with losses that could be carried over and exploited for tax purposes was the acquiring company. The Commissioner appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Merrill, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership