Commissioner v. Estate of Gidwitz
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
196 F.2d 813 (1952)
- Written by Joe Cox, JD
Facts
Jacob Gidwitz, who was 72 years old and had suffered a heart attack, made an irrevocable transfer of stock valued at $140,610 to a trust to equalize the holdings of his sons. The trust received both ownership of the stock and a separate right to receive the income on that stock. The sons could not enjoy the trust property during Gidwitz’s life, and Gidwitz’s transfer of stock was acknowledged to be a transfer in contemplation of death, or causa mortis. At the time of Gidwitz’s death, the total assets of the trust had a valuation of $341,102.02. The government (plaintiff) argued that the valuation should include not only the original value of $140,610 but also the stock income the trust received before Gidwitz’s death. Gidwitz’s estate (defendant) argued that only the original value of $140,610 should be included in the gross estate. While prior caselaw had established that the value to be included in the gross estate was the exact property transferred by the decedent, the question remained as to whether the value of the stock could be separate from the right to income from the stock into two separate gifts made by Gidwitz. The tax court found for the estate, and the government appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Swaim, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.