Commissioner v. LoBue

351 U.S. 243 (1956)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Commissioner v. LoBue

United States Supreme Court
351 U.S. 243 (1956)

Facts

LoBue (plaintiff) was a manager at the Michigan Chemical Corporation. In 1944, the corporation initiated a stock option plan, granting LoBue the option to purchase 340 shares for $5 each. At that time, LoBue secured the options with promissory notes to be paid upon exercising the options. The options were not transferable, and LoBue had to remain an employee in order to exercise them. Between 1946 and 1947, LoBue exercised all of the stock options available to him. In all, LoBue paid the corporation $1,700 for company stock with a market value of $9,930 at the time of exercise. The corporation deducted the difference ($8,230) as an expense on its tax returns for 1946 and 1947, but LoBue did not include it as income on his tax returns. The commissioner of internal revenue (defendant) assessed a deficiency against LoBue on the grounds that the gain represented compensation for personal services that should be taxed. LoBue petitioned the tax court for review. The tax court found that the granting of stock options was meant to confer a proprietary ownership interest in the corporation and did not constitute additional compensation. The court of appeals affirmed, and the commissioner appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Harlan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership