Commissioner v. Morris Trust
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
367 F.2d 794 (1966)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
American Commercial Bank (American), a North Carolina bank chartered under state law, sought to merge with Security National Bank of Greensboro (Security National), a national bank chartered under federal law. The parties wanted the merged company to operate under the national charter, not the state charter. American had operated an insurance division. However, a nationally chartered bank could not lawfully operate such an insurance division. To avoid breaking the law, the parties organized the transaction so as to spin off American’s insurance business before the merger. American transferred its assets connected with the insurance business to a newly formed corporation, American Commercial Agency, Inc. (ACA), in exchange for ACA’s stock, which American then distributed to its own shareholders (plaintiffs). American then merged with Security National, with Security National as the surviving entity. After the merger, American’s banking business continued to be operated by Security National. American’s shareholders treated their receipt of the ACA stock as tax-free. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) disagreed, arguing that, when the spin-off of the insurance company and the merger of the banks were stepped together, the overall transaction did not qualify as a tax-free reorganization. The United States Tax Court ruled in favor of the shareholders, and the IRS appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Haynsworth, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.