Commissioner v. Sullivan

210 F.2d 607 (1954)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Commissioner v. Sullivan

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
210 F.2d 607 (1954)

Facts

The Texon Royalty Company (Texon) incurred a suit for damages resulting from an oil-well blowout. The uncertainty of Texon’s future operations led to a large-scale sale of leases and equipment, reducing the size of the business. Texon effected a redemption and cancellation of 2,000 of its 5,000 shares of capital stock. The 2,000 shares were redeemed at $100 per share, resulting in a payout of $200,000 to Georgia Sullivan and Betty Garnett, Texon’s two sole shareholders (the shareholders) (defendants). The tax treatment of this transaction became the subject of a dispute in the United States Tax Court. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (plaintiff) argued that the transaction was equivalent to a dividend, taxable as income. The shareholders argued that the transaction was a payment in exchange for stock, taxable as a capital gain. The court found in favor of the shareholders. The commissioner appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Holmes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership