Commissioner v. Wilson

353 F.2d 184 (1965)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Commissioner v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
353 F.2d 184 (1965)

Facts

William Wilson, operator of a furniture business, died in 1950. Wilson’s widow and sons (defendants) continued the businesses as a partnership. In 1955 the sons formed Wilson’s Furniture, Inc., transferring the partnership’s assets to the corporation. In 1958 Wilson’s Furniture formed a spin-off corporation, Wil-Plan, to which it transferred its conditional sales contracts involving deferred payments. All stock in Wil-Plan was distributed to the sons, with a fair market value of $69,020.07 each, on which the sons paid no taxes. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (plaintiff) assessed deficiencies. The sons filed for a redetermination in the United States Tax Court, asserting that the corporate division was motivated by valid business purposes and thus merited treatment as a nontaxable reorganization. The tax court disagreed that the business purposes existed at the time of the transaction. However, the court also found that the spin-off was not motivated by the purpose of tax avoidance. The court ruled in favor of the sons. The commissioner appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Madden, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership