Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct of Iowa State Bar Association v. Mershon
Iowa Supreme Court
316 N.W.2d 895 (1982)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Attorney Robert Mershon (defendant) provided ongoing legal representation to Leonard Miller, a farmer in Iowa. Miller owned 100 acres of land that he wanted to develop into a residential development, but lacked the financing to support the project. A local landscape architect, R.O. Schenk, suggested to Miller and Mershon that the three men form a company to develop the land through obtaining third-party financing. The three men formed Union Township Development, Inc. (Union Township), to which Miller contributed the land, Schenk signed a promissory note agreeing to contribute engineering services, and Mershon signed a promissory note agreeing to perform future legal services. In exchange, Miller received 400 shares of stock and Mershon and Schenk received 200 and 400 shares of stock, respectively. The company never obtained financing and the project fell apart. Thereafter, Miller died and Mershon was appointed executor of Miller’s estate for a brief period of time until he resigned. Thereafter, the Iowa State Bar Grievance Commission (Commission) (plaintiff) investigated and reprimanded Mershon for failing to obtain Miller’s consent to his ownership in Union Township. Mershon appealed. The Iowa Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McCormick, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.