Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Association v. Nadler
Iowa Supreme Court
467 N.W.2d 250 (1991)
- Written by Gonzalo Rodriguez, JD
Facts
Isadore Nadler (defendant), an Iowa attorney, was hired to represent David Greer Jr., a high-school student, in a personal-injury lawsuit due to injuries suffered as a result of a car crashing into Greer’s school bus. According to an orthopedic surgeon who evaluated Greer’s injuries, Greer would continue to suffer pain and problems in the future as a result of the accident. Sometime later, the car driver’s insurance carrier contacted Nadler, asking for an update on Greer’s medical condition and for an opportunity to meet and discuss settlement options. Nadler did not respond. Two years after the accident, having not heard from Nadler in some time, Greer contacted Nadler for an update on the case. Nadler admitted that he had failed to file the lawsuit and that the two-year statute of limitations had expired. The Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Association (plaintiff) charged Nadler with violating the Iowa Code of Professional Responsibility for Lawyers. After a hearing, the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa (commission) recommended that Nadler be suspended from practice for three years. Nadler sought review of the commission’s recommendations by the Iowa Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Andreasen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

