From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct of the Iowa State Bar v. Hill
Iowa Supreme Court
436 N.W.2d 57 (1989)
In 1986, William Hill (defendant) was retained by KC to represent her in a dissolution-of-marriage proceeding. KC also sought to obtain temporary custody of her three children. At the time KC retained Hill, she was unemployed, drug dependent, and emotionally unstable. Because she had no money, KC offered to have sexual intercourse with Hill in exchange for his legal representation. Hill told KC that he would give her a personal loan and that she did not need to have sex with him. After KC informed Hill that she would be unlikely to ever pay him back, Hill and KC had sexual intercourse. Hill also gave KC $50. KC later dismissed the divorce action and reconciled her marriage. Following the sexual encounter, the Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct of the Iowa Bar Association (plaintiff) filed a complaint against Hill on the ground that he had violated multiple disciplinary rules and ethical considerations. The state’s grievance commission held a hearing on the matter. The commission recommended to the Iowa Supreme Court that Hill’s license be suspended for three months upon a finding that he violated the state’s disciplinary rules and ethical considerations by (1) engaging in conduct that is illegal, involves moral turpitude, and reflects poorly on his fitness to practice law; (2) failing to conduct himself according to professional standards; and (3) conducting himself in a way that leads to a lack of confidence, respect, and trust. Hill argued that the proceedings violated his right to privacy and the sexual intercourse was solely a romantic counter that did not involve money. The Iowa Supreme Court reviewed the matter.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Andreasen, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.