This website requires JavaScript. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari.

Options

From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...

Committee on Professional Ethics v. Crary

Iowa Supreme Court

245 N.W.2d 298 (1976)

Facts

When Sue Evans Curtis had an affair with attorney William Crary, her husband secretly hired a private investigator to follow her. Crary represented Mrs. Curtis when she filed for divorce. During her deposition, Mrs. Curtis repeatedly lied about supposed trips out of town while Crary sat next to her and did nothing. After the deposition recessed for a day, Mrs. Curtis continued lying, and Crary still sat silently. Another attorney representing Mrs. Curtis suspected she was lying, confronted Crary, learned the truth, said, “She can’t just sit there and tell this story,” and immediately stopped the deposition. The Iowa Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct charged Crary with violating the ethical rules by allowing Mrs. Curtis to perjure herself and for other incidents. Crary countered that the privilege against self-incrimination prevented him from having to correct Mrs. Curtis’s perjury because doing so could have produced evidence to charge him with criminal adultery. Crary also claimed attorney-client privilege protections. The committee issued a report concluding that Crary did not need to correct Mrs. Curtis’s perjury because opposing counsel already knew it was false. Noting possible disagreement, the Iowa Supreme Court held a hearing before issuing its decision.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Uhlenhopp, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
The procedural disposition (e.g., reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.
Unlock this case brief Read our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.
Learn about our approach Read more about Quimbee

Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
35,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
Uniform format for every case brief
Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
Top-notch customer support