Commonwealth ex rel. Smith v. Myers
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
438 Pa. 218, 261 A.2d 550 (1970)
In 1947, in the course of an armed robbery committed by James Smith, Edward Hough, and David Almeida (defendants), police officers arrived at the scene and a gunfight ensued. A bullet struck and killed a bystander, but it was not clear whether one of the robbers or one of the police officers fired the fatal bullet. A jury convicted the robbers of the bystander's felony murder, after the judge instructed the jury that who fired the fatal shot was irrelevant. The judge told the jury to convict the robbers if they found that the armed robbery was the proximate cause of the bystander's death. Almeida appealed his conviction. In 1949, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania approved the trial judge's instruction and affirmed Almeida's conviction. In 1966, Smith petitioned for habeas corpus on the grounds that the trial judge's instruction denied him due process. A lower court denied the petition, and Smith appealed to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the composition of which had changed since 1949.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O'Brien, J.)
Dissent (Bell, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.