Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Lynn

114 A.3d 796 (2015)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Lynn

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
114 A.3d 796 (2015)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

William Lynn (defendant) was the Secretary for Clergy for the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Philadelphia. As secretary, Lynn was responsible for clergy assignments and for investigating and addressing claims of child sexual abuse involving clergymen. To help with child sexual-abuse investigations, Lynn had access to the archdiocese’s secret archive containing all allegations made against clergymen. Using that archive, Lynn compiled a list of 35 active-duty clergymen accused of sexually abusing children, including Reverend Edward Avery, a pedophile with a long history of sexual misconduct with minors. Lynn did not investigate the allegations on the list and did not restrict the 35 active-duty clergymen from interacting with children. Over the many years Lynn served as Secretary of Clergy, Lynn received multiple, credible reports of past child sexual abuse involving either Avery or one of the other 35 active-duty clergymen on Lynn’s list. Lynn did not meaningfully investigate any of those reports. Even though Lynn knew Avery was a child molester, Lynn assigned Avery to St. Jerome’s, a church with an attached elementary school. While at St. Jerome’s, Avery sexually assaulted D.G., a 10-year-old student, on multiple occasions. After almost a decade of investigating allegations of sexual abuse within the archdiocese, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (plaintiff) charged Lynn with endangering the welfare of a child, arguing that Lynn endangered D.G. by assigning Avery, a known child molester, to St. Jerome’s. At trial, the commonwealth submitted extensive evidence that Lynn had known about, and had disregarded, credible claims of sexual abuse against Avery and numerous other clergymen under Lynn’s supervision. The trial court convicted Lynn. Lynn appealed, and the appellate court reversed, holding that Lynn could not be held liable for endangering D.G. because he did not directly supervise D.G. The commonwealth appealed, arguing that Lynn, as Secretary of Clergy, had supervisory authority over the welfare of all children in the archdiocese.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Baer, J.)

Dissent (Saylor, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership