Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
498 A.2d 806 (1985)
Ignoring the clearly visible “No Trespass” sign, Capitolo (defendant) and others crawled under a fence surrounding a power plant and sat down holding hands in protest. A plant security guard told the group to leave or otherwise be arrested for trespassing. Capitolo and the others remained and were subsequently bodily removed from the property by deputy sheriffs and each charged with criminal trespass. There were no injuries that resulted from the group’s actions and no damage to property. At trial, Capitolo and the others attempted to rely on the state’s “choice of evils” law to justify that their conduct was necessary to avoid a greater harm, but their request for a jury instruction on the matter was rejected by the trial court. Capitolo and the others were convicted and they appealed. The appellate court reversed and the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania granted review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Papadakos, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.