Commonwealth v. Feinberg
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
211 Pa.Super. 100, 234 A.2d 913 (1967)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Max Feinberg (defendant) sold home-use Sterno in his store, which was located in a derelict neighborhood. Although Sterno was manufactured for heating purposes, Feinberg knew that his mostly poor customers tended to use Sterno in making intoxicating drinks. Home-use Sterno contained a weak solution of methyl alcohol. To save money, Feinberg stopped selling home-use Sterno and started selling cheaper institutional-use Sterno. Feinberg was unaware that institutional-use Sterno contained a much stronger methyl-alcohol solution. However, Feinberg knew that, unlike home-use Sterno, institutional-use Sterno came in cans marked with a skull-and-crossbones and labelled: "Danger. Poison; Not for home use. For commercial and industrial use only." Feinberg did not call his customers' attention to these warnings. Over a few weeks, Feinberg sold 400 cans of the product to his customers, five of whom died of methyl-alcohol poisoning. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (plaintiff) successfully prosecuted Feinberg for involuntary manslaughter. Feinberg appealed to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Montgomery, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,600 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.