Commonwealth v. Konz
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
450 A.2d 638 (1982)

- Written by Sarah Holley, JD
Facts
Reverend Konz was a diabetic who had administered insulin treatment to himself for over 15 years. Reverend Konz decided to discontinue insulin treatment upon the belief that God would heal his condition and formed a pact with Erikson (defendant) to help him resist any temptation. Reverend Konz became ill shortly thereafter and attempted to retrieve insulin from his refrigerator but found that it had been hidden by his wife, Mrs. Konz (defendant). When Reverend Konz attempted to search for the insulin’s whereabouts, he was forced into a room by Mrs. Konz and Erikson where he was prevented from calling the police to obtain assistance. Following a half-hour conversation, the group returned to the kitchen, and Reverend Konz assured both his aunt and daughter that all had been settled, that there was no cause for concern, and that he had no intention of administering insulin. That afternoon, Reverend Konz canceled a speaking engagement and he and Mrs. Konz drove to a hospital to pick up a nurse friend. The nurse observed that Reverend Konz was conversant, rational, and cognizant of his environs, and Reverend Konz made no mention of his need for insulin, which was available at the hospital. Reverend Konz became increasingly ill upon their return home, but neither Mrs. Konz nor Erikson sought medical aid. Mr. Konz died of diabetic ketoacidosis the following morning. Mrs. Konz and Erikson (as an accomplice) were convicted of involuntary manslaughter.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Flaherty, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.