From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Commonwealth v. Leon L.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
52 Mass. App. Ct. 823, 756 N.E.2d 1162 (2001)
Police officers brought 14-year-old Leon L. and 13-year-old Carl C. (defendants) to the police station with their mothers to question the boys about an intentional fire that had destroyed property. Both families were relatively new to the United States and did not speak much English. A bilingual police officer translated during the interrogations. This officer gave Miranda warnings to the boys in Spanish and English and asked the mothers if they had understood the warnings. Both mothers said that they understood, and the mothers and the boys all signed Miranda waivers agreeing to let the boys speak with the police. Leon and Carl each initially denied any involvement in the fire. However, the interrogating officer exerted pressure by yelling and using aggressive body language and physical gestures, such as pounding the table. The officer also made it difficult for the mothers to speak with their sons and allegedly threatened one boy that he would be locked up alone if he did not confess. The boys were scared and crying and eventually submitted to the interrogating officer, claiming that they had been involved in the fire. At trial, the boys moved to suppress the confessions. The trial court suppressed the confessions because (1) the mothers had not truly understood the Miranda warnings and, therefore, were not interested adults who had helped the sons make valid, knowing waivers and (2) the totality of the circumstances showed that the boys’ statements were not voluntary, reliable confessions. The government (plaintiff) appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Greenberg, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.