Commonwealth v. Olshefski
Pennsylvania District and County Court
64 Pa. D. & C. 343 (1948)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Felix Olshefski (defendant) had his driver, John Fisher, take one of Olshefksi’s trucks to the Gilberton Coal Company and have it loaded with coal. In Pennsylvania, the truck’s gross weight limit was 15,750 pounds. After Olshefski’s truck had been loaded with the coal, a weigh slip was given to Fisher indicating that the truck’s gross weight was 15,200 pounds. Fisher drove the truck to Olshefski’s home and placed the weigh slip in the truck. The following day, Olshefski went to a bank in Danville to do some business. While there, he noticed that police officers were at the northern end of the river bridge checking the weight of crossing trucks. Olshefski then returned home. Shortly thereafter, Olshefski drove his truck loaded with coal to the northern end of the river bridge on his way to the Danville’s scales for the purpose of having it weighed. To sell the coal in Danville, a city ordinance required that the seller have a Danville weigh slip. Before reaching the scales, however, he was directed by a police officer to a different set of scales. After his truck was weighed, Olshefski was handed a weigh slip indicating a gross weight of 16,015 pounds, 265 pounds over the limit. The police officer cited Olshefski with a violation of the state’s Vehicle Code and the matter was presented for disposition in court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kreisher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.