Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Commonwealth v. Peaslee

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
59 N.E. 55 (1901)


Peaslee (defendant) made plans to burn down a building and to defraud its insurers. He collected and prepared combustibles so that only the lighting of the combustibles remained. Peaslee solicited an employee of his to light the fire. The employee refused. At a later time, Peaslee and the employee were in a car driving towards the building. When they were about a quarter mile away, Peaslee decided not to go through with the plan and drove away. Peaslee was indicted for the attempted burning of the building. Peaslee brought a motion to quash and requested a directed verdict in his favor.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Holmes, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 239,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.