Commonwealth v. Rozplochi

385 Pa. Super. 357 (1989)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Commonwealth v. Rozplochi

Pennsylvania Superior Court
385 Pa. Super. 357 (1989)

Facts

Barbara Cavaliere and Elizabeth DeJesse were working inside the office of a financial-services business, which was located inside a grocery store. Cavaliere heard a knock on the door and saw Albino Rozplochi (defendant) through a window next to the door. Cavaliere asked Rozplochi to state his business through the door. Rozplochi said he had a package for her and held up an identification card and a manila envelope. Cavaliere began to open the door to admit him but became suspicious. As she attempted to close the door, she saw that Rozplochi had a gun. Cavaliere and DeJesse attempted to push the door closed but Rozplochi forced his way in, while brandishing the gun and threatening to “blow them away.” Once inside the office, Rozplochi pointed the gun at both women and threatened to kill them. Rozplochi forced Cavaliere to turn over approximately $22,000 in cash and food stamps from the office safe. Rozplochi then fled and was later arrested and charged with numerous crimes including two counts of robbery, one against Cavaliere and one against DeJesse. Rozplochi was convicted on both counts of robbery. Rozplochi appealed on the basis of ineffective counsel, alleging that his counsel failed to assert that one theft from a single place of business could not support two charges of robbery.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Beck, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership