Commonwealth v. Runyan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
922 N.E.2d 794 (2010)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Police responded to a complaint that someone was firing a BB gun at a home from the window of a neighboring home. When officers arrived at the scene, they found that the BB gun shooter was an 18-year-old male with developmental disabilities. When they asked the young man if there were any other guns in the home, he showed them two firearms owned by his father, Richard Runyan (defendant). One of the firearms was secured with a trigger lock; the other was unsecured. Runyan was charged with violation of a Massachusetts statute that required firearms to be locked or otherwise inoperable when not under the control of their owner. Runyan moved for dismissal. The trial judge granted the motion, applying the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution to the state as a substantive-due-process right and citing District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) as controlling authority. In Heller, the United States Supreme Court invalidated a law that required handguns kept in the home to be inoperable at all times. The commonwealth (plaintiff) applied for directed appellate review, which was granted by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gants, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
