Commonwealth v. Runyan

922 N.E.2d 794 (2010)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Commonwealth v. Runyan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
922 N.E.2d 794 (2010)

Facts

Police responded to a complaint that someone was firing a BB gun at a home from the window of a neighboring home. When officers arrived at the scene, they found that the BB gun shooter was an 18-year-old male with developmental disabilities. When they asked the young man if there were any other guns in the home, he showed them two firearms owned by his father, Richard Runyan (defendant). One of the firearms was secured with a trigger lock; the other was unsecured. Runyan was charged with violation of a Massachusetts statute that required firearms to be locked or otherwise inoperable when not under the control of their owner. Runyan moved for dismissal. The trial judge granted the motion, applying the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution to the state as a substantive-due-process right and citing District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) as controlling authority. In Heller, the United States Supreme Court invalidated a law that required handguns kept in the home to be inoperable at all times. The commonwealth (plaintiff) applied for directed appellate review, which was granted by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gants, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership