Commonwealth v. Sa
Court of Appeals of Massachusetts
790 N.E.2d 733 (2003)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
After leaving a bowling alley and pool hall, Seap Sa (defendant) drove his cousin, the cousin’s girlfriend, and two other females, including the 17-year-old victim, to their respective homes. The victim was the last to be dropped off. Sa ignored the victim’s directions to her house and continued driving. As Sa drove farther from her home, the victim became increasingly scared and agitated. Sa told the victim that he was going to rape her and threatened to kill her if she did not cooperate. Sa pulled the car over and raped the victim. Afterward, the victim directed Sa to her boyfriend’s house so that Sa would not know where she lived. Sa dropped off the victim. The following morning, the victim and the boyfriend had sexual intercourse. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts (plaintiff) charged Sa with aggravated rape. During cross-examination of the victim, defense counsel sought to introduce the evidence of the victim’s post-rape sexual intercourse with her boyfriend to show she was not traumatized or psychologically injured by the rape. The prosecution objected, and the trial court sustained the objection, ruling that the state’s rape shield statute precluded any questioning about the post-rape intercourse. Sa failed to provide any other evidence to support his claim. The jury convicted Sa of aggravated rape, and he appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Duffly, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.