Commonwealth v. Shea
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
496 N.E.2d 631 (1986)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
As Jeffrey Thyng was leaving a country club around 2:00 a.m., Shea (defendant) and Bradford Couronis, approached him. Couronis made a derogatory remark to Thyng and Thyng made a similar remark in return. As Thyng was leaving the area to meet a friend nearby, Shea and Couronis followed him. Thereafter, the three men got into an altercation and Thyng was pushed to the ground, breaking his right hand. After Shea and Couronis punched and kicked Thyng on the ground several times, Thyng was stabbed in the chest. Thyng could not identify which of the two men had stabbed him. A friend of Thyng ran to find a police officer. Two officers chased Shea and Couronis from the scene and subsequently were apprehended trying to enter a truck. The officers found no weapons on Couronis, but did find a blood-soaked knife in an unbuckled sheath located on Shea’s belt. Blood was also observed all over the insides of Shea’s hands, coat, on his right arm, and on his belt. Blood was also detected on Couronis’ jersey, undershirt, and pants, but not on his hands or arms. Shea was tried and convicted of armed assault with intent to murder, assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon, and disorderly conduct and sentenced to serve two concurrent six to 10 year prison terms. Shea appealed. The appellate court affirmed the judgment of the trial court and the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.