Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Commonwealth v. Shea

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
496 N.E.2d 631 (1986)


Facts

As Jeffrey Thyng was leaving a country club around 2:00 a.m., Shea (defendant) and Bradford Couronis, approached him. Couronis made a derogatory remark to Thyng and Thyng made a similar remark in return. As Thyng was leaving the area to meet a friend nearby, Shea and Couronis followed him. Thereafter, the three men got into an altercation and Thyng was pushed to the ground, breaking his right hand. After Shea and Couronis punched and kicked Thyng on the ground several times, Thyng was stabbed in the chest. Thyng could not identify which of the two men had stabbed him. A friend of Thyng ran to find a police officer. Two officers chased Shea and Couronis from the scene and subsequently were apprehended trying to enter a truck. The officers found no weapons on Couronis, but did find a blood-soaked knife in an unbuckled sheath located on Shea’s belt. Blood was also observed all over the insides of Shea’s hands, coat, on his right arm, and on his belt. Blood was also detected on Couronis’ jersey, undershirt, and pants, but not on his hands or arms. Shea was tried and convicted of armed assault with intent to murder, assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon, and disorderly conduct and sentenced to serve two concurrent six to 10 year prison terms. Shea appealed. The appellate court affirmed the judgment of the trial court and the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts granted review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 200,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.