Commonwealth v. Sherry

386 Mass. 682, 437 N.E.2d 224 (1982)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Commonwealth v. Sherry

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
386 Mass. 682, 437 N.E.2d 224 (1982)

Play video

Facts

Sherry (defendant), Hussain, and Lefkowitz, physicians at a Boston hospital, were attending a party held for some hospital staff. During the party, the three physicians grabbed the victim and pulled her out of the apartment with the intent to go to another town. The victim protested but did not physically resist because she thought they were just “horsing around.” Once outside the apartment, Hussain carried the victim over his shoulder to Sherry’s car and held her in the front seat as the four drove to Rockport. She said she was not in fear at this time. When they arrived at Lefkowitz’s house in Rockport, the victim asked to be taken home. Instead, Hussain carried her inside where the three subsequently had independent sexual intercourse with the victim. The victim testified that she felt physically numbed and could not fight, and that she was humiliated and disgusted. On the way back to Boston, the physicians and the victim stopped to view a beach, eat breakfast, and get gas. The victim was taken back to her car and then she drove herself home. The three physicians were indicted for kidnapping and rape. During trial, the three physicians’ testimony substantially conflicted with that of the victim. The physicians testified that the victim had consented to the sexual intercourse. The physicians requested a jury instruction that told jurors to acquit the physicians of rape unless they found beyond a reasonable doubt that the physicians had actual knowledge of the victim’s lack of consent. The court refused to give that instruction. The jury found the three physicians not guilty of kidnapping, but convicted each of rape. Sherry, Hussain, and Lefkowitz appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Liacos, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership