Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
79 F.3d 790 (1996)
- Written by Ann Wooster, JD
Facts
A Washington State (defendant) statute made it a felony to help another person to commit suicide. The legislation effectively banned physicians from prescribing life-ending medication for patients who were terminally ill and wished to die. Physicians (plaintiffs) treating terminally ill, competent adults (patients) (plaintiffs) who wished to end their lives with prescribed medication challenged the state statute by filing suit in district court. The physicians and patients argued that the statute impaired the liberty interests of terminally ill patients in violation of substantive-due-process rights protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The district court ruled that a terminally ill, competent adult has a substantive-due-process right guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendment to commit physician-assisted suicide as a liberty interest. The district court determined that the Washington statute placed an undue burden on a terminally ill, competent adult’s exercise of that liberty interest. The state appealed. A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s decision on the basis that there was no liberty interest in physician-assisted suicide protected by substantive-due-process rights. The Ninth Circuit decided to rehear the case with all of its judges because of the importance of the decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Reinhardt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.