Competex, S.A. v. LaBow
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
783 F.2d 333 (1986)

- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
LaBow (defendant) lost a substantial amount of money speculating in copper on the London Metal Exchange. LaBow used Competex, S.A. (plaintiff) as a broker, and Competex paid LaBow’s debt. Competex then sued LaBow in the English High Court of Justice and obtained a default judgment for £187,929.82. Competex then filed a diversity action in federal court to enforce the English judgment. After a bench trial, the trial court ruled that the English judgment should be recognized and enforced. The trial court applied the breach-day conversion rule, in accordance with New York law. Under the breach-day conversion rule, a foreign judgment is converted to US currency as of the date of the breach, which the trial court determined was the date that the English judgment was entered. The trial court determined that the conversion rate on that day was £1 = $2.20. However, the pound had deteriorated related to the dollar between the date of the English judgment and the trial court’s decision and continued to deteriorate after that. LaBow filed a motion with the trial court requesting clarification that he could satisfy the judgment in either US dollars or in pounds. The trial court denied the motion, and LaBow appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.