Compton v. Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.

64 F.Supp.3d 1 (2014)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Compton v. Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
64 F.Supp.3d 1 (2014)

Facts

Sandra Compton and Lessie Cofield (plaintiffs) were long-standing members of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. (AKA) (defendant). AKA was an organization with a rich history dedicated to counteracting the effects of discrimination and patriarchy against African-American women. Compton and Cofield had hoped their respective daughters (the daughters) would join AKA when they attended Howard University (Howard) (defendant). However, due to a series of unanticipated events, the daughters were not able to join AKA. Compton and Cofield sued AKA and Howard for breach of contract, tortious interference with contractual relations, and negligence, alleging that their daughters were wrongfully denied entry to AKA at Howard. Compton and Cofield contended that the amount in controversy in their lawsuits, including medical bills, emotional harm, mental anguish, loss of prospective economic advantages, and punitive damages, exceeded $75,000. AKA and Howard argued that Compton and Cofield’s claims must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because neither Compton nor Cofield could recover more than $75,000 in damages for the harm they alleged. Compton and Cofield also alleged that—following the filing of the suit—AKA withdrew their membership privileges. As a result, Compton and Cofield filed additional claims against AKA for ultra vires acts and intentional infliction of emotional harm (the remaining claims).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Collyer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership