Compton v. Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
64 F.Supp.3d 1 (2014)
- Written by Elliot Stern, JD
Facts
Sandra Compton and Lessie Cofield (plaintiffs) were long-standing members of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. (AKA) (defendant). AKA was an organization with a rich history dedicated to counteracting the effects of discrimination and patriarchy against African-American women. Compton and Cofield had hoped their respective daughters (the daughters) would join AKA when they attended Howard University (Howard) (defendant). However, due to a series of unanticipated events, the daughters were not able to join AKA. Compton and Cofield sued AKA and Howard for breach of contract, tortious interference with contractual relations, and negligence, alleging that their daughters were wrongfully denied entry to AKA at Howard. Compton and Cofield contended that the amount in controversy in their lawsuits, including medical bills, emotional harm, mental anguish, loss of prospective economic advantages, and punitive damages, exceeded $75,000. AKA and Howard argued that Compton and Cofield’s claims must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because neither Compton nor Cofield could recover more than $75,000 in damages for the harm they alleged. Compton and Cofield also alleged that—following the filing of the suit—AKA withdrew their membership privileges. As a result, Compton and Cofield filed additional claims against AKA for ultra vires acts and intentional infliction of emotional harm (the remaining claims).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Collyer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.