Conan Properties International LLC v. Sanchez

2018 WL 3869894 (2018)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Conan Properties International LLC v. Sanchez

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
2018 WL 3869894 (2018)

Facts

Conan Properties International LLC (CPI) and Robert E. Howard Property Inc. (REH) (plaintiffs) owned copyrights in pulp-fiction novels, graphic novels, and comic books written by Robert E. Howard in the 1930s. Howard’s works featured Conan the Barbarian (Conan) and six other characters. CPI owned the rights to Conan, and REH owned the rights to the others (REH characters). Ricardo Sanchez (defendant), a resident of Spain, offered miniature sculptures of the copyright-protected characters for sale on Facebook and Kickstarter. CPI and REH sued Sanchez for copyright infringement and alleged in their complaint that either CPI or REH owned the copyright in each of the underlying works in which each character first appeared and listed the copyright registration number for each work. CPI and REH also submitted copies of the certificates of registration and a declaration tracing ownership of the copyrights from Howard to CPI and REH. The complaint sought damages and injunctive relief. Sanchez failed to appear, and CPI and REH moved for a default judgment. The district court referred the motion to the magistrate judge, who found liability as to three of the REH characters but determined that the complaint failed to state a claim with respect to the remaining characters, including Conan. In particular, the magistrate disregarded the copyright registrations in the underlying works, finding that ownership in the copyrights for the characters instead had to be established by detailed descriptions delineating each character’s metes and bounds. The magistrate held that CPI and REH did not meet this standard. CPI and REH objected to the magistrate’s recommendations.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Block, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership