Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
746 F.2d 466 (1984)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (defendant) granted a new license for the operation of the Rock Island Hydropower Project (Rock Island project). The project was the first to include a dam that spanned the Columbia River. The Rock Island Dam had a significant impact on the anadromous fish runs (salmon and trout). The dam implemented methods like fish ladders to assist adult fish migrating upstream. However, the dam did not ensure juvenile fish could pass through the dam. As a result, many juvenile fish died trying to pass the dam. Chelan County Public Utility District No. 1 (Chelan) applied for a new license for the Rock Island project because its existing license was expiring. FERC granted the new license without requiring Chelan to submit a fish-and-wildlife report as required by FERC regulation, and it deferred consideration of fish-protection issues to a subsequent proceeding. The National Marine Fisheries Service of the Department of Commerce, the Washington State Departments of Fisheries and Game, the National Wildlife Federation, and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation (plaintiffs) filed a petition in the court of appeals for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Anderson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.