Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Connecticut Light and Power Co. v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
673 F.2d 525 (1982)


Facts

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) (defendant) had technical guidelines for assessing the fire-safety measures in place at nuclear power plants. After using these guidelines for several years, the NRC created a comprehensive fire-protection program. The NRC’s notice of proposed rulemaking for the program did not indicate whether a plant with a previously approved fire-safety program would be required to make changes in order to be in compliance with the new regulations. However, the NRC’s final rules applied certain new requirements to all plants. The final rules also required the NRC to grant an exemption from any of the new requirements if a plant could show that a required modification either would not improve, or would be detrimental to, the plant’s overall safety. The NRC’s final-exemption decisions were subject to judicial review. The Connecticut Light and Power Company (Connecticut Light) (plaintiff) challenged the NRC’s imposition of the new requirements under the comprehensive fire-protection program, arguing that the NRC had failed (1) to provide proper notice of proposed rulemaking and (2) to offer sufficient technical justification for the rules the NRC adopted.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Mikva, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.