Conrad v. AM Community Credit Union

750 F.3d 634 (2014)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Conrad v. AM Community Credit Union

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
750 F.3d 634 (2014)

Facts

Catherine Conrad (plaintiff) was a self-employed entertainer who would perform singing telegrams while dressed as a banana. Employees of AM Community Credit Union (employees) (defendants) hired Conrad to perform at a company event. Conrad alleged that she told the employees to inform audience members that they were not to take photos and videos of her performance for any reason other than personal use. Conrad filed suit, alleging that infringement of her intellectual-property rights occurred when audience members later posted their photos and videos of her performance to internet websites. At the time, Conrad had copyrights in photos and sculptures of her in her banana costume. Conrad had also filed an action based on the same occurrence in Wisconsin state court, and her claims were dismissed. Similarly, the district court in the present action granted the employees’ motion to dismiss the case, stating that Conrad’s claims were barred because of the dismissal of the Wisconsin case arising from the same facts. Conrad appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 814,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership