Conservation Council for Hawaii v. Babbitt

2 F. Supp. 2d 1280 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Conservation Council for Hawaii v. Babbitt

United States District Court for the District of Hawaii
2 F. Supp. 2d 1280 (1998)

Facts

Several plant species in Hawaii were designated as threatened or endangered, which, pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (ESA), should have resulted in the designation of critical habitats. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) (defendant), pursuant to its regulations, refused to designate critical habitats, arguing that (1) the designation of critical habitats would increase illegal taking of the species; (2) the designation of critical habitats on private land had no benefit, because the consultation requirement of the ESA did not apply to private activities; and (3) the designation of critical habitats on federal land had no benefit, because the protections afforded to threatened and endangered species under the ESA’s consultation requirement rendered the added protections for critical habitats redundant. The FWS’s refusal covered several species without addressing each individually. The Conservation Council of Hawaii, Sierra Club, and Hawaiian Botanical Club (collectively, the conservationists) (plaintiffs) sued and filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the FWS failed to supply a rational basis for its refusal to designate critical habitats.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kay, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership