Conservation Northwest v. Sherman
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
715 F.3d 1181 (2013)
- Written by Melanie Moultry, JD
Facts
The Northwest Forest Plan (NFP) required an ecosystem-management approach for federal forests within the range of the northern spotted owl. The NFP’s Survey and Manage Standard (standard) required agencies to conduct surveys of species located within federal forests. Conservation Northwest and a coalition of environmental groups (plaintiffs) sued the Bureau of Land Management, the United States Forest Service, and the Fish and Wildlife Service (agencies) (defendants), objecting to changes to the standard. The district court approved and entered a settlement between the plaintiffs and the agencies in the form of a consent decree, which effectively amended the standard by changing species classifications and establishing exemptions from pre-disturbance surveys. A defendant-intervenor appealed the approval of the consent decree to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tashima, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.