Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Arroll

Civil Court of the City of New York
322 N.Y.S.2d 420 (1971)


Facts

Mark Arroll (defendant) was a customer of Consolidated Edison Co. of New York (Con Edison) (plaintiff). Arroll disputed the amounts due to Con Edison in five bills for electricity consumed during the summers of 1968, 1969, and 1970. On December 6, 1969, Arroll sent a letter to the president of Con Edison. The letter disputed the amounts due for three Con Edison bills and stated that Arroll would send three checks in the amount of $35.00 each to the post office box Con Edison designated for payment of bills. The letter also stated that Con Edison’s cashing or retention of the checks would constitute full accord and satisfaction of Con Edison’s claims. On September 25, 1970, Arroll sent a similar letter with respect to the remaining two bills in dispute. In accordance with the letters, Arroll sent five checks in the amount of $35.00 each to the post office box. On each check, Arroll wrote that the check was in full payment and satisfaction for its corresponding bill. Arroll also wrote the words “paid in full” on each check and referenced either the December 6, 1969 or the September 25, 1970 letter. Con Edison replied by letter that the five bills were accurate, but did not mention the checks. Con Edison received each check and deposited them. Con Edison then brought suit against Arroll to recover the difference between the amount received and the amount billed. Arroll argued accord and satisfaction of the amount due.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Sanders, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.