Consorcio Ecuatoriano De Telecomunicaciones v. JAS Forwarding (USA)
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
685 F.3d 987 (2012)
- Written by Emily Pokora, JD
Facts
Consorcio Ecuatoriano de Telecomunicaciones S.A. (Consorcio) (plaintiff) contracted with Jet Air Service Ecuador S.A. (JASE) (defendant) for logistic services related to Consorcio’s cell phone shipments. The rates charged by JASE were determined by weight. The agreement included an arbitration provision for disputes to be resolved by arbitration in Ecuador by the Center for Arbitration and Conciliation of the Guayaquil Chamber of Commerce. Consorcio believed that JASE was improperly calculating weights and overcharging Consorcio and filed an application under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 seeking invoicing information from JASE Forwarding (USA), Inc. (JAS) (defendant), JASE’s invoicing company in Miami, Florida. The district court granted the application, and Consorcio subpoenaed the records. JASE intervened, seeking to vacate the order through a motion to quash. JASE’s motion and motion for reconsideration were denied, and JASE appealed. JASE argued that the evidence sought was not related to a foreign-tribunal proceeding as required by § 1782 and was unduly intrusive because it sought confidential proprietary information.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marcus, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
