Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Construction Industry Association v. City of Petaluma

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
522 F.2d 897 (1975)


Facts

The City of Petaluma (Petaluma) (defendant) in California responded to a nearly 25 percent increase in population between 1970 and 1972 by adopting several resolutions collectively known as the Plan. The Plan was intended to limit population increase in order to protect the small-town character and open spaces of Petaluma. The Plan limited the amount of new housing units in projects involving five or more units to 500 within a five-year period. The Plan also positioned a greenbelt around Petaluma and required building permits to be evenly allocated between the eastern and western sections of Petaluma, as well as between single-family dwellings and buildings with multiple residential units. The Construction Industry Association of Sonoma County and two landowners (plaintiffs) filed suit in federal district court, challenging the Plan as: (1) arbitrary; (2) in violation of substantive due-process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment, including the right to travel; and (3) an unreasonable burden on interstate commerce. The district court found that the express purpose and actual effect of the Plan was to exclude substantial numbers of people who would otherwise move to Petaluma. The district court further ruled that certain aspects of the Plan unconstitutionally denied the right to travel by limiting the natural population growth of the area. Accordingly, the district court enjoined Petaluma from implementing the unconstitutional aspects of the Plan. Petaluma appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Choy, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.