Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
2015 WL 1013508 (2015)


Facts

ITT Educational Services, Inc. (ITT) (defendant) was a for-profit college. Many ITT students had limited financial means and had to obtain tuition funding through federal student loans to attend. However, even with this assistance, some ITT students still needed additional revenue for tuition. ITT offered these students short-term, no-interest loans called temporary credit. Students had to pay back the temporary credit at the end of the academic year. Unfortunately, when the time for repayment arrived, many students could not pay back the temporary credit. Accordingly, ITT established a private-loan program and encouraged students to take out private loans so that they could pay back the temporary credit. Students relied on ITT’s guidance and claimed they did not fully understand the ramifications of taking out private loans. ITT assisted students in the process of taking out the loans and helped them complete the requisite forms. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Bureau) (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against ITT. Bureau alleged that ITT violated the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA), 12 U.S.C. §§ 5531(a), 5564(a) and 5565. The Bureau also maintained that ITT violated the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601 et seq. ITT moved to dismiss.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Barker, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.