Consumers Insurance Co. v. Cimoch
Washington Court of Appeals
69 Wash. App. 313, 848 P.2d 763 (1993)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Mary Ann and Norman Cimoch (defendants), a married couple, owned Northwest Underwriters (NWU), an insurance company that acted as the general agent for Consumers Indemnity Company (CIC), a subsidiary of Consumers Insurance Company (Consumers) (plaintiff). Norman told Mary Ann that he planned to purchase CIC from Consumers in exchange for $1.5 million of community stock that Norman held in Consumers’ parent company. However, in the final purchase agreement, Norman agreed to pay $2.95 million for CIC, payable in $14,000 monthly installments. Mary Ann was not informed that the purchase agreement involved cash outlays and debt in addition to the stock exchange. After Norman failed to make the required monthly payments, Consumers filed a breach-of-contract action against Norman, Mary Ann, and the marital community. Consumers argued that Mary Ann and the marital community (collectively, Mary Ann) should be held liable because the purchase agreement was a community liability and because Mary Ann ratified the agreement by accepting its benefits. The trial court entered uncontested findings that Mary Ann did not consent to the purchase agreement, that she was unaware of its terms, and that the purchase was outside the ordinary course of business for NWU. After trial, the trial court held that (1) Norman was individually liable for breaching the purchase agreement and (2) Mary Ann was not liable because the agreement was entered into without her consent or ratification. Consumers appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scholfield, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.