Consumers Int'l v. Sysco Corp.
Arizona Court of Appeals
951 P.2d 897, 191 Ariz. 32 (1997)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Sysco Corp. (Sysco) (defendant) contracted with Consumers International, Inc. (CI) (plaintiff) to supply at least 80 percent of the food service products that CI distributed to its customers. The contract contained a termination at will clause that stated: “This agreement may be terminated . . . [b]y either party upon sixty (60) days prior written notice to the other party.” Sysco invoked this clause and gave CI 60 days notice of its intent to terminate the contract. Sysco did not offer a reason for its termination of the contract, but there was no evidence of bad faith. CI brought suit for wrongful termination of contract, claiming that the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing required that any termination at will clause inherently required a showing of good cause. The trial court granted Sysco’s motion for summary judgment. CI appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Voss, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.