Continental Time Corp. v. Merchants Bank of New York

459 N.Y.S.2d 396 (1983)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Continental Time Corp. v. Merchants Bank of New York

New York Supreme Court
459 N.Y.S.2d 396 (1983)

Facts

Continental Time Corporation (Continental) (plaintiff) received an irrevocable letter of credit as payment for an approximately $236,000 shipment of watches. Under the letter of credit’s terms, (1) Continental needed to present the letter and certain documents from the shipment to Credit Suisse to receive payment and (2) Credit Suisse’s obligation to pay the amount could be revoked only with the agreement of all parties. Merchants Bank of New York (Merchants) (defendant) was Continental’s bank. On Continental’s behalf, Merchants presented the letter of credit and shipping documents to Credit Suisse as a documentary draft, requesting payment of the $236,000. Credit Suisse noticed that a shipping airbill in the supporting documents did not list the departing or arriving airports and rejected the payment request due to the noncompliant document. At that point, because the letter of credit was irrevocable, Continental had a right to fix the airbill and resubmit the letter. However, without permission from Continental, Merchants revoked the letter of credit on Continental’s behalf and authorized Credit Suisse to request new payment from the watch buyer. Thus, the letter of credit was revoked and became invalid. But the buyer refused to provide new payment, leaving Continental with no money for the sale. Continental sued Merchants for negligence, for violating the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), and for violating the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (UCP). Continental then moved for summary judgment on its claims.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Blyn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership