Continental Time Corp. v. Swiss Credit Bank
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
543 F. Supp. 408 (1982)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
Continental Time Corp. (Continental) (plaintiff) received a letter of credit from Swiss Credit Bank (defendant). Continental assigned its interest in the letter of credit to S. Frederick & Company (Frederick) and to Arlington Distribution Co., Inc. (Arlington). The letter of credit expired without any payments made. Frederick and Arlington sued Swiss Credit in Switzerland to recover damages under their assigned portions of the letter of credit. Continental and Frederick settled related claims between them, and as part of the settlement, Frederick reassigned a portion of its interest in the letter of credit back to Continental. Regardless of the settlement, Arlington still intended to pursue its claims in the Switzerland action. Six months after Frederick and Arlington sued Swiss Credit in Switzerland, Continental commenced an action in the United States to recover damages resulting from Swiss Credit’s allegedly wrongful refusal to honor the letter of credit. Swiss Credit moved to dismiss Continental’s lawsuit or stay the action because, when the action was filed, Continental no longer had any legal interest in the letter of credit and because the earlier Switzerland action was still pending.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lasker, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.