Convening Authority v. Private Doyle
Ireland Courts-Martial Appeal Court
2 ILRM 213 (1996)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Private William Doyle (defendant) was a member of the Irish military (plaintiff). Doyle was addicted to alcohol and left the military without authorization, i.e., deserted. Doyle then worked at various other jobs, including serving in the French Foreign Legion for five years. After 12 years, Doyle had his alcohol addiction under control and sought to return to the military. The military charged Doyle with desertion. At Doyle’s trial, the prosecution relied on a rebuttable statutory presumption that anyone who had been absent from the military for more than six months presumably intended to remain absent permanently. Doyle testified that the presumption was inaccurate and that he had never intended to remain away from the military permanently. Doyle was convicted and discharged from the military as his punishment. Doyle appealed, arguing that the rebuttable presumption that he was guilty violated his right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.