Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Cook’s Pest Control, Inc. v. Rebar

Supreme Court of Alabama
852 So.2d 730 (2002)


Facts

Robert and Margo Rebar (plaintiffs) entered into a one-year renewable agreement with Cook’s Pest Control, Inc. (Cook’s) (defendant) for Cook’s to inspect and treat the Rebars’ home for termites. The agreement provided that it would continue as long as the Rebars continued to pay the annual renewal fee. The agreement also contained an arbitration clause, which required all disputes between the parties involving the contract to be submitted to binding arbitration. Before the initial agreement term expired, Cook’s requested that the Rebars renew the agreement for another year by paying the renewal fee. The Rebars submitted a check for the renewal fee, along with an addendum to the agreement. The addendum stated that arbitration was not required for any disputes between the parties. The addendum also provided that continuation of services or acceptance of the renewal payment by Cook’s would constitute acceptance of the addendum’s new terms. Cook’s deposited the Rebars’ check and continued to perform termite inspections and treatment services for the Rebars. The Rebars then sued Cook’s for fraud, negligence, breach of contract, breach of warranty, unjust enrichment, and bad faith. Because the Rebars’ claims implicated the Rebars’ contractual relationship with Cook’s, Cook’s moved to compel arbitration of those claims. The circuit court denied Cook’s motion, and Cook’s appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Stuart, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.