Cook v. Cook
Arizona Supreme Court
691 P.2d 664 (1984)
Rose Cook (plaintiff) and Donald Cook (defendant) lived together between 1969 and 1981. Rose and Donald never married, but they held themselves out as husband and wife. During their relationship, Rose and Donald agreed that they would pool their earning and share equally in their joint accumulations. To this end, they maintained various accounts in the names of “Rose and Don Cook” as joint tenants, using these funds to pay for household expenses. In 1981, Rose left Donald, retaining only a car and small amount of money, while Donald kept the rest of the couple’s property. Rose brought suit against Donald, claiming breach of their agreement. The court of appeals found in Donald’s favor, concluding that division of property acquired during nonmarital cohabitation, pursuant to an agreement between the parties, was not permissible under Arizona law.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Feldman, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.