Cook v. Food and Drug Administration

2013 WL 3799987 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cook v. Food and Drug Administration

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
2013 WL 3799987 (2013)

AR

Facts

Cook (plaintiff) and other death-row prisoners sued the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for allowing the import of lethal-injection drugs without reviewing the shipments. One of the drugs used for lethal injections was no longer made in the United States, so the FDA allowed its importation without review in deference to law enforcement agencies. The relevant portion of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act stated that the Secretary of the Treasury must deliver samples of drugs, furnish a list of establishments registered with the FDA, and that drugs made in unregistered establishments that fail testing must be refused admission to the United States. Cook argued that the FDA could not choose to import drugs from unregistered establishments without review. The FDA argued that any enforcement decisions were left up to its discretion. The district court found that the FDA’s drug importation decisions were subject to judicial review, and the FDA appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership