Cookson v. Brewer School Department

974 A.2d 276 (2009)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cookson v. Brewer School Department

Maine Superior Judicial Court
974 A.2d 276 (2009)

  • Written by Mike Begovic, JD

Facts

Kelly Jo Cookson (plaintiff), a lesbian woman, was the head coach of the Brewer High School varsity softball team. During the 2005 season, a former player’s mother complained to the superintendent, Betsy Webb, accusing Cookson of initiating a hazing incident. Webb investigated and, after learning of a previous similar hazing incident in 2004, issued Cookson a letter of reprimand. Daniel Lee succeeded Webb as superintendent. One month into Lee’s tenure, he received a notice of a tort claim by the former player’s family, referencing both hazing incidents. Lee met with Cookson to discuss the tort claim and informed Cookson that he was not considering her removal as head coach or termination. Lee subsequently conducted his own investigation into the tort claim and learned about the earlier complaint and reprimand letter. While Lee was considering whether to recommend Cookson as head coach, he learned of her sexual orientation. Lee met with parents and informed them that there were concerning things in Cookson’s file that he could not share, and he mentioned it was similar to a situation at another school involving a staff member who was a member of a nudist colony. Lee did not recommend Cookson, instead nominating the junior varsity softball coach, who was also a lesbian woman. The school committee accepted Lee’s recommendation. Cookson filed a complaint against the Brewer School Department (the school) (defendant), alleging employment discrimination in violation of the Maine Human Rights Act, which banned discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. The court entered summary judgment in favor of the school and Lee.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Saufley, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership