Cookson v. Brewer School Department
Maine Superior Judicial Court
974 A.2d 276 (2009)
- Written by Mike Begovic, JD
Facts
Kelly Jo Cookson (plaintiff), a lesbian woman, was the head coach of the Brewer High School varsity softball team. During the 2005 season, a former player’s mother complained to the superintendent, Betsy Webb, accusing Cookson of initiating a hazing incident. Webb investigated and, after learning of a previous similar hazing incident in 2004, issued Cookson a letter of reprimand. Daniel Lee succeeded Webb as superintendent. One month into Lee’s tenure, he received a notice of a tort claim by the former player’s family, referencing both hazing incidents. Lee met with Cookson to discuss the tort claim and informed Cookson that he was not considering her removal as head coach or termination. Lee subsequently conducted his own investigation into the tort claim and learned about the earlier complaint and reprimand letter. While Lee was considering whether to recommend Cookson as head coach, he learned of her sexual orientation. Lee met with parents and informed them that there were concerning things in Cookson’s file that he could not share, and he mentioned it was similar to a situation at another school involving a staff member who was a member of a nudist colony. Lee did not recommend Cookson, instead nominating the junior varsity softball coach, who was also a lesbian woman. The school committee accepted Lee’s recommendation. Cookson filed a complaint against the Brewer School Department (the school) (defendant), alleging employment discrimination in violation of the Maine Human Rights Act, which banned discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. The court entered summary judgment in favor of the school and Lee.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Saufley, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.