From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Cooley v. Weinberger
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
518 F.2d 1151 (1975)
Doris Cooley (plaintiff) was married to Melvin Cooley. The couple lived in Iran, where Melvin worked as the sole wage earner. During an argument, Doris shot Melvin three times, killing him. Doris contended that Melvin had been intoxicated and attacked her and that the gun had been shot accidentally while the two were struggling. After a trial, Doris was convicted of willful homicide by an Iranian court. After serving a prison sentence in Iran, Doris returned to the United States and applied for Social Security benefits arising from Melvin’s death. An administrative-law judge heard evidence regarding the application. Doris contended her Iranian conviction did not comport with the requirements of due process, alleging that she was not permitted to consult with her attorney, did not receive Miranda warnings, was not permitted to post bail, was not indicted, and was not permitted to cross-examine witnesses, and that the prosecution was not required to prove her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. After analyzing the circumstances surrounding Doris’s conviction, the administrative-law judge denied Doris’s application for benefits under a regulation that forbade a person convicted of felonious and intentional homicide of a decedent from receiving benefits arising from the decedent’s death. The administrative-law judge found that Doris had been represented by an attorney of her choice, that the witnesses had been cross-examined by the judges, and that she had been tried and convicted in accordance with Iranian law and procedure. The appeals council upheld the denial of benefits. Doris then commenced suit in federal court seeking judicial review of the denial. The trial court upheld the denial of benefits. Doris appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (McWilliams, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.