Coolidge v. Coolidge
Vermont Supreme Court
287 A.2d 566 (1971)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Melvin Coolidge, his wife Carrie Coolidge (plaintiff), and their son (defendant) were conveyed a farm as joint tenants. The three understood the conveyance to mean that the ultimate survivor among the three would own the farm outright. After Melvin died, Carrie moved away from the farm and filed a petition for partition of the farm under a Vermont statute stating that a joint tenant had a right to partition. The son argued that the statute did not apply if the joint tenants had understood that the property would pass to the surviving joint tenant. The trial court granted Carrie’s petition and ordered partition of the farm. The son appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Barney, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.